104 persuasive speech topics + how-to guide
Info: 9666 words (39 pages) Blog
Published: 12 May 2025

Persuasive speeches are a common assignment in UK schools and universities, challenging students to convince an audience of a particular point of view. In this comprehensive guide, we will first walk through how to write a persuasive speech – covering structure, techniques, and tips – and then provide an extensive, well-organised list of persuasive speech topics.
How to write a persuasive speech: a step-by-step guide
Writing a persuasive speech involves presenting a clear argument and supporting it with evidence, all while engaging your audience. Whether you’re a sixth form student preparing for a GCSE English presentation or a university student in a debate society, the following steps will help you create an effective persuasive speech.
Understand your purpose and audience:
Before you start writing, clarify why you are giving this speech and who will be listening. Are you trying to change minds about a school policy at a sixth form assembly. Or, are you arguing a point in a university seminar? Tailor your content and tone to your audience’s knowledge level and values. For example, if you’re addressing fellow students, you might reference university life or A-level experiences. But if you’re speaking to a community group, you might include examples involving local councils or Parliament. Understanding your audience will help you choose arguments that resonate and an approach that is respectful and impactful.
Choose a compelling topic:
Pick a topic that genuinely interests you and is relevant to your audience. Passion is key – if you care about the topic, it will come through in your speech and persuade others. If the topic isn’t assigned, brainstorm issues you find important. This could range from debating the future of the NHS to discussing social media’s impact on GCSE results. Ensure the topic is neither too broad (which can overwhelm both you and the audience) nor too narrow. Ideally, phrase it as a clear statement or question that you can argue for or against. (See the extensive list of persuasive speech topics below for inspiration.)
Research thoroughly and gather evidence:
Once you have a topic, research is your best friend. A strong persuasive speech is backed by facts, examples, and credible evidence. Use a variety of quality sources: books, academic journals, reputable news outlets (BBC News, The Guardian, etc.), and official statistics (for example, from the ONS or NHS data).
Find the most recent information – for instance, use Parliament reports or government websites for data on education or health. Also, research counterarguments: understanding the opposing viewpoint will strengthen your speech (you’ll be prepared to refute those points). Keep notes of key facts, and remember to verify information. Using evidence not only bolsters your argument (logos) but also improves your credibility (ethos) as a speaker.
Organise your ideas and structure your speech:
A persuasive speech needs a clear structure – typically an introduction, a main body (with arguments), and a conclusion. Start by outlining your main points in a logical order. Here’s a classic structure to follow:
- Introduction: Grab the audience’s attention and state your thesis (the position you’re arguing). You might open with a hook – an interesting quote, a surprising statistic, or a vivid scenario. For example, if your topic is climate change, you could start with a striking fact about weather extremes. After the hook, clearly state your stance (e.g. “I believe the UK should lower the voting age to 16, and I’ll explain why”). Keep the introduction concise but impactful, and make sure the audience knows what you’ll be arguing.
- Body: This is the heart of your speech, where you present your arguments and evidence. Divide the body into a few main points (typically 2 to 4 key arguments) – each should support your overall position. Start each point with a clear topic sentence or statement. (e.g. “First, lowering the voting age could increase civic engagement among youth.”). Then provide supporting material: explain your reasoning, give facts or examples, and where possible, include country-specific reference (such as a statistic about 16-17 year-old voter turnout in Scotland). Use one paragraph or section per main argument to keep things organised.
- Address counterarguments as well – it’s persuasive to acknowledge the other side. You might say, “Some argue that 16-year-olds aren’t mature enough to vote. However, consider that at 16 in the UK one can marry or join the Army with parental consent – responsibility is already expected at this age.” Refuting opposing views shows you’ve thought about the issue in depth.
- Conclusion: Sum up your arguments and end with a strong closing statement. The conclusion should restate your position (re-emphasising your thesis in light of the evidence you present). Thus, you can leave the audience with something memorable. Many persuasive speeches end with a call to action, which urges the audience to do something or at least to agree openly. For example, “It’s time to give our youth a voice. Let’s lower the voting age and strengthen our democracy together.” Keep your conclusion concise and powerful – this is what the audience will remember best.
Use persuasive language and rhetorical techniques:
The words and techniques you use can greatly enhance the power of your speech. There are various rhetorical devices to make writing more persuasive – use these to your advantage:
- Rhetorical questions: Ask questions that make the audience think and lead them toward your viewpoint. “How would you feel if you had to choose between buying textbooks and eating dinner? For many students facing high tuition fees, this is reality.” Such questions engage listeners emotionally.
- The rule of three (triadic structure): Presenting ideas in threes can be memorable and impactful. “The policy is unfair, ineffective, and out of date.” You’ll see this technique in political speeches, and it can work in your school speeches too.
- Repetition: Repeating key phrases or words can emphasise your point. Think of Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous “I have a dream” – repetition drives the message home. You might repeat a slogan or a key idea, such as “Education is a right, not a privilege” at several points in a speech about tuition fees.
- Emotive language (Pathos): While maintaining an appropriate academic tone, you can use emotionally charged examples or words to make the audience feel something. For instance, describing the “heart-breaking impact of poverty on children in our cities” can support a point about income inequality. Just be careful not to overdo it or replace facts entirely with emotion; balance is key.
- Credible references (Ethos): As a student speaker, you establish trust by showing you’ve done your homework. Citing a well-known source or mentioning experts can lend weight to your argument. “According to a study by Oxford University, renewable energy could save the UK billions in the long run.” Even though you might not have the authority of an adult expert, referencing reputable information makes you more convincing. Use our referencing generators: APA 7, Harvard or Vancouver – to cite your sources in the correct format.
Maintain a clear and appropriate tone:
Use an academic yet accessible tone. Avoid slang or overly casual language in formal speeches. However, do speak in a way that feels natural to you – your voice should sound authentic. If you’re discussing a serious topic like healthcare policy or climate change, a serious and respectful tone is appropriate. For a lighter topic, a touch of humour or irony can work (as long as it’s suitable for the audience).
Always imagine how you would say the words out loud; writing for speaking is a bit different from writing an essay. Shorter sentences can help ensure your points are clear when spoken. And while using sophisticated vocabulary can be good in an academic setting, make sure you define or explain any complex terms that your audience might not know. Clarity is more important than trying to sound overly intellectual.
Edit and practise your speech:
Writing the speech is only the first part – editing and practice are crucial. Review your draft to tighten up the language. Remove any jargon or confusing points. Make sure each argument directly supports your thesis. Moreover, that the overall flow makes sense (one idea should lead naturally to the next).
Once you’re happy with the content, practise delivering the speech out loud. This will help you gauge the timing and find any tongue-twister sentences to simplify. Practising also builds confidence. You can practice in a variety of ways.
- In front of a mirror;
- Record yourself, or;
- Ask a friend or family member (perhaps your mum or a classmate) to be your audience.
Pay attention to your intonation and pace – you don’t want to rush through important points. Mark pauses in your notes if needed. The more familiar you are with your speech, the more convincingly you can deliver it.
Engage your audience during delivery:
While this guide is about writing, remember that you must ultimately speak to an audience with a persuasive speech. How you engage them can enhance the words you’ve written. Use eye contact if it’s an in-person speech – look around the room or at the camera for a virtual presentation.
Use natural gestures to emphasise points (for example, counting on your fingers when listing three points). Vary your tone and volume to maintain interest: you may express important points a bit louder or with deliberate pauses after them for effect. If appropriate, ask the audience to imagine scenarios or even participate (e.g. a show of hands for a quick poll) to keep them invested. These delivery techniques, combined with a well-written script, will make your persuasive speech more effective.
By following these steps – understanding your audience, choosing a great topic, researching, structuring your speech well, using persuasive techniques, and practising your delivery – you’ll be on your way to writing a persuasive speech that can sway opinions. Once you feel confident in how to write a persuasive speech, it’s time to pick a topic that suits your interests and goals. In the next section, we provide a comprehensive list of persuasive speech topics to inspire you, with an emphasis on topics relevant to students in the UK.
Persuasive speech topics by category

Below is an extensive list of persuasive speech topics, grouped into categories for easy browsing. There are well over 100 topics here, exceeding the usual lists you might find online, to give you plenty of ideas. Each topic is accompanied by a brief description or prompt on how you might approach it in a speech. Remember, a good persuasive topic is one that interests you and can engage your listeners.
Education and student life speech topics
- Should GCSEs be scrapped or reformed? – Discuss whether the GCSE exams adequately measure student ability or if the UK should replace them with alternate assessments. You could argue about stress on pupils, the importance of exams for standards, or possible alternatives like coursework-based qualifications.
- A-Levels vs. Baccalaureate: What’s the best path? – A persuasive look at whether the UK should keep A-level specialisation or adopt a broader curriculum (such as the International Baccalaureate or a Scottish-style broader Higher system). Address how each system affects university preparation and student stress levels.
- University tuition fees should be reduced or eliminated – Take on the debate about the high cost of university in England (up to £9,250 per year). You might argue that free university (as it was in the past, or as it is for Scottish students in Scotland) would increase access to education and benefit society, or counter with arguments about funding and quality.
- Should private schools in the UK be abolished? – A controversial topic examining educational inequality. Argue whether elite independent schools (public schools in UK parlance like Eton) entrench privilege. In turn, should we integrate them into the state system? Or, do they require heavy taxation, versus points about parental choice and the high academic results often achieved.
- Do school uniforms benefit students? – Persuade your audience on whether uniforms (a staple of British schools) promote discipline and equality or suppress individuality and impose unnecessary rules. Use examples like how uniforms might reduce bullying by equalising dress, or conversely how non-uniform policies in some sixth forms work well.
- Replace exams with coursework for better learning – Argue for or against the idea that British schools place too much emphasis on final exams (GCSEs, A-levels) and that continuous assessment or coursework would better reflect a student’s abilities. You could mention the 2020 exam cancellation and teacher-assessed grades as a case study.
- Should coding and digital skills be core subjects? – A topic about modernising the curriculum: discuss if programming and digital literacy should be treated as core subjects like maths and English. A persuasive angle might highlight the importance of tech skills for future jobs and the success of schemes to introduce coding in primary schools.
- Homework: essential practice or needless stress? – Take a stance on whether homework in secondary schools needs limiting or even abolishing. Supporters say it reinforces learning; critics say it exacerbates student stress and disadvantages those with less support at home. This is a relatable topic for many students.
- Later school start times for sixth formers – Argue whether UK secondary schools (especially sixth forms) should start the day later (e.g. 10am instead of 9am) to align with teenage sleep patterns. Use research on adolescent sleep and examples of pilot programmes that showed improved concentration, versus concerns about logistics and after-school activities.
- Should schools teach more life skills? – Persuade your audience that the national curriculum should include practical life skills like personal finance management, basic cooking, first aid, or mental health awareness. Conversely, you could argue that academic subjects already overload timetables. Citing examples (like some schools offering a “Life Skills” programme or GCSE in financial education) will add weight.
- Make work experience compulsory for Year 11-12 – Discuss whether every student should complete a work experience placement during GCSE or A-level years. Points could include the benefits of real-world experience and career insight versus the challenge of coordinating placements and the risk of it being just a box-ticking exercise.
- Ban mobile phones in schools? – This topic weighs the pros and cons of prohibiting smartphones on school premises. In your speech, you might argue that phones distract from learning and contribute to cyberbullying, using examples of schools that have seen improved results after bans. Or, argue the other side: that phones can be learning tools and banning them infringes on personal responsibility.
Society and culture
- The impact of social media on youth mental health – Explore how platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat affect the mental well-being of young people in the UK. You can reference rising anxiety/depression rates and body image issues among British teens. In support, you can argue whether stricter regulation or education on social media use is necessary.
- Cancel culture: accountability or censorship? – Persuade listeners on whether “cancel culture” (publicly calling out and boycotting individuals for offensive actions or statements) has gone too far in society or is a justified way of holding people accountable. Use examples of the “cancellation” of certain UK media figures or celebrities, and discuss free speech implications.
- Should the UK abolish the monarchy? – A classic UK debate: argue for or against keeping the British monarchy. Pro-abolition arguments might cite democratic principles and cost to taxpayers for the Royal Family. Pro-monarchy arguments could mention tradition, national identity, or tourism revenue. This topic lets you delve into constitutional roles (King as head of state) versus modern democratic values.
- Is Britain still a class society? – Discuss whether class distinctions (working, middle, upper class) still heavily influence opportunities in the UK. You could use examples like accent prejudice, old boys’ networks from private schools, or data on social mobility. Persuade your audience if we must do more to break class barriers? Alternatively, argue that class is less relevant today than it once was.
- Britishness tests for immigrants: fair or pointless? – Debate the “Life in the UK” test that immigrants take for citizenship. Are such tests effective in encouraging integration, or are they merely trivia and a barrier for otherwise contributing residents? You might cite some sample questions (e.g. history and culture facts) to illustrate your points.
- Should there be quotas for women in Parliament? – Argue whether the UK should implement mandatory quotas for female Members of Parliament (or corporate board members) to ensure gender representation. Pro arguments can discuss overcoming systemic bias and successful quota examples in other countries. Alternatively, con arguments might claim positions should be merit-based without quotas.
- The influence of social media influencers – Persuade your audience on whether influencers and YouTubers are a positive force in society (as new voices of marketing and role models for entrepreneurship) or a negative one (promoting unrealistic lifestyles and consumerism). A UK student might reference popular British influencers, ASA regulations on advertising, or incidents of criticism of influencers.
- Is the British press too intrusive? – Debate whether UK media (tabloid press in particular) should have stricter privacy limits. Use high-profile examples like the press treatment of royalty and celebrities, phone-hacking scandals, or cases where paparazzi behavior caused harm. You can discuss balancing freedom of the press with the right to privacy.
- Cultural appropriation vs. appreciation – In a multicultural UK, discuss whether borrowing elements from other cultures (in fashion, music, festivals, etc.) is offensive or a form of flattery. Persuade your audience by examining examples – from wearing traditional attire as fashion to restaurants adapting foreign cuisines – and argue how to distinguish respectful appreciation from harmful appropriation.
- Statues of controversial figures: remove or retain? – Many UK towns have memorials to historical figures under more heavy scrutiny (imperialists, slave traders, etc., e.g. the Edward Colston statue in Bristol). Argue whether such statues should be taken down as a statement against past injustices? Or if they should remain as historical reminders (perhaps with context plaques that offer additional context). This topic engages with history, memory, and modern values.
- Should TV shows and films be censored for modern audiences? – Persuade listeners on whether older television programmes and books that contain outdated, offensive stereotypes (racial, gender, etc.) should come with content warnings, edits, or outright removal from broadcasting. You could mention the BBC and classic comedies or children’s books that employ insensitive content, and argue for artistic integrity versus social responsibility.
Politics and government speech topics
- Lower the voting age to 16 in all UK elections – Argue whether 16- and 17-year-olds should be allowed to vote. Use the example that in Scotland and Wales, 16-year-olds can vote in certain elections (Scottish Parliament, Welsh Senedd), and debate if this should be extended to General Elections UK-wide. Points include maturity and stake in future (pro) versus questions of political knowledge and responsibility (con).
- House of Lords: reform or abolish? – Persuade your audience on what should be done with the UK’s unelected second chamber. You might argue for abolition in favour of a smaller elected senate, or for major reforms (like removing hereditary peers). Conversely, you could argue the House of Lords provides expert review and stability, though most student speeches lean towards democratic reform.
- First-Past-the-Post vs. Proportional Representation – A political system debate focusing on UK elections. Argue whether First-Past-the-Post (used in Westminster elections) is archaic and unfair. Compare that to proportional representation (PR) systems which might better reflect the popular vote. Use examples like how smaller parties (Greens, Liberal Democrats) get significant votes but few seats. Opposing arguments might mention stable governments and the constituency link.
- Should the UK rejoin the EU? – Post-Brexit, debate whether the UK should consider re-entering the European Union (or at least the Single Market). A persuasive speech could highlight economic impacts on trade and young people’s opportunities (like Erasmus programmes) versus arguments about sovereignty and control that led to Brexit. This topic is timely and could be passionate, but ensure to back up points with facts given how complex Brexit is.
- Scottish independence: for or against? – Discuss whether Scotland should be an independent country. Persuade your audience by weighing the arguments: pro-independence (self-determination, specific political preferences, etc.) and pro-union (economic risks of separation, benefits of UK unity). If you’re not in Scotland, make sure to approach this topic with respect and an understanding of the nuances.
- Should the UK have compulsory voting? – Argue if voting in General Elections should be mandatory by law (as it is in Australia) to improve democratic participation. Points could include the low turnout rates, particularly among young people, and whether compulsion would legitimise results or infringe on personal freedom. Mention what would happen (fines? a “none of the above” option?) and examples from countries that enforce it.
- Make the UK Constitution written and codified – Persuade listeners on whether Britain should finally write down its constitution in one document. Pro arguments: clarity, citizen education, preventing government overreach (especially after debates on prerogative powers during Brexit). Con arguments: the flexibility of the current unwritten system, difficulty of summarising complex conventions. A student could cite recent constitutional controversies to illustrate the need (or lack thereof).
- The case for an English Parliament – Discuss whether England should have its own devolved Parliament similar to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, to address issues like the West Lothian question. Argue if this would make governance more fair and balanced, or if it’s unnecessary and adds another layer of bureaucracy.
- Tougher rules for MPs’ conduct – Argue that Members of Parliament should face stricter penalties (or perhaps recall by constituents) for misconduct or breaking rules. Use examples of recent scandals (expenses, lobbying, etc.) and public trust in politicians. This topic can resonate with an audience frustrated by politics, persuading them that reforms would improve accountability.
- Decentralise power away from London – Persuade your audience that the UK government should invest more in the North of England, Midlands, or other regions (the “levelling up” debate). You could argue that we concentrate too much political and economic power in London. Perhaps you’ll propose solutions like moving government departments out of London or granting more powers to city mayors. Conversely, consider if London’s status is beneficial for the whole country.
- Immigration policy: open borders or stricter control? – A sensitive but significant topic in UK politics. Argue either that the UK should be more welcoming to immigrants and refugees (for economic growth, humanitarian duty, diversity) or that the country needs stronger controls on immigration (citing pressures on housing, jobs, and public services). A balanced approach might be to advocate for a compassionate but managed system. Use recent examples like refugee crises or points-based immigration rules to ground your argument.
Law, ethics and justice speech topics
- Restore the death penalty for severe crimes? – A debate on whether capital punishment should be reinstated in the UK for the most serious offences. The UK abolished the death penalty decades ago, so a persuasive speech might argue against bringing it back due to wrongful convictions and human rights, or argue for it citing justice for heinous crimes and deterrence. Be aware of the strong emotions in this topic and use evidence (like crime statistics or moral philosophy) carefully.
- Legalise assisted dying for the terminally ill – Persuade your audience on whether euthanasia/assisted suicide should be legal in the UK for people with terminal illnesses who are suffering. Use ethical arguments about the right to choose one’s death with dignity (perhaps referencing cases of British patients travelling to Dignitas in Switzerland) versus concerns about potential abuse and the sanctity of life. This topic requires a sensitive and respectful approach given its gravity.
- Surveillance vs. privacy: do we overuse CCTV cameras? – The UK is known for extensive CCTV surveillance in public spaces. Argue whether this level of surveillance is necessary for safety and crime prevention, or if it invades privacy and personal freedom. You can cite how CCTV has helped solve crimes or, on the other side, how living under constant watch might affect society. Including the newer debate on online surveillance (like monitoring internet use or phone data by the government via laws like the Investigatory Powers Act) can broaden the topic.
- Tighter internet regulation to combat hate speech – Should the UK government enforce stronger laws on online content to prevent hate speech, fake news, and cyberbullying? Persuade listeners by discussing the harms caused by online hate or misinformation (possibly referencing real incidents in the UK) and whether measures like the Online Safety Bill, stricter moderation, or user verification are justified. Opposing points might include freedom of expression and the challenges of censorship.
- Ban or regulate violent video games? – An ethics and youth topic. Argue whether violent video games (or other media) require stricter regulation or banishment for underage audiences due to concerns about real-life aggression. Use research on the influence of media on behaviour, and consider the effectiveness of PEGI age ratings. An opposing view is that games are a scapegoat and that censorship isn’t the answer, citing the lack of clear evidence linking games to violent crime.
- Animal testing: necessary or unethical? – Persuade your audience on whether we should continue or phase out animal experimentation for medical research. The speech can mention the UK’s regulations on animal research, the role such testing has played in developing treatments (especially vaccines or medicines), against the moral argument and availability of alternative methods. You might also touch on cosmetic testing (which the UK/EU bans) to highlight evolving ethics.
- Should fox hunting remain illegal? – A specifically British ethical debate. Fox hunting with dogs was banned in 2004, but it still stirs strong opinions. Argue whether the ban should stay (on grounds of animal cruelty) or whether traditional hunts (which claim to follow drag hunting now) deserve more freedom. This can broaden into a discussion on tradition vs. animal rights, and rural perspectives vs. urban sentiments.
- Mandatory vaccines: public safety vs. personal choice – In the context of public health, argue if certain vaccinations (like MMR for schoolchildren, or COVID-19 vaccines for certain jobs) should be legally required. Use the example of how some countries require childhood immunisations to attend school. Discuss the balance between community health (herd immunity, protecting the NHS from outbreaks) and individual rights. Be sure to handle it factually to avoid misinformation.
- Should we decriminalise drug use? – A topic on law and social policy: persuade listeners on whether the UK should treat the possession of small amounts of drugs (e.g. cannabis) as a health issue rather than a criminal one. Arguments for decriminalisation include reducing prison populations and focusing on treatment, referencing Portugal’s approach. Arguments against might cite concerns that it could encourage drug use or that it doesn’t align with international conventions. This is a complex issue touching on ethics, public health, and criminal justice effectiveness.
- Are British prisons too soft or too harsh? – Debate the state of the UK prison system. One angle: argue that prisons should focus more on rehabilitation (education, training, mental health support) to reduce reoffending, rather than punishment. Use evidence of reoffending rates and successful rehabilitation programmes. The opposing stance might claim that prisons are not deterring crime enough. Ergo, it is now necessary to employ more stringent punishment or longer sentences for serious offences. This topic allows discussion of the purpose of the justice system and can incorporate comparisons to systems in Scandinavia (rehabilitation-focused) or the US (harsher penalties).
Health and well-being speech topics
- The NHS needs more funding, not privatisation – Argue that the National Health Service should remain publicly funded and free at the point of use, with increased government investment to solve issues like long waiting times. A persuasive speech on this could cite doctors’ and nurses’ perspectives, patient stories, or comparisons to health systems abroad. Conversely, one could argue that some level of privatisation or reform is necessary to improve efficiency. But given most UK students value the NHS, the popular stance is defending it and pushing for support.
- Mental health education in schools – Persuade your audience that UK schools should incorporate mental health awareness and coping strategies into the curriculum (many are starting to). Use the rise in teenage mental health issues as a rationale, and suggest that teaching students about stress management, depression, or where to get help (perhaps via programmes with NHS mental health services or charities) can reduce stigma and support well-being. If arguing against, one might say parents should handle this – but most will find a pro-education stance compelling.
- Should the drinking age remain at 18? – Debate if the UK’s legal drinking age of 18 is appropriate or if it should rise (as in the US at 21) to curb binge drinking, or even lowered in controlled environments. A persuasive angle could discuss health statistics: Britain’s youth drinking culture vs. places with higher ages. Another viewpoint: enforcement and cultural change might be more effective than changing the age law. This topic lets you touch on health, personal freedom, and cultural norms.
- Is the “sugar tax“ enough to fight obesity? – In 2018 the UK introduced a tax on sugary drinks. Argue whether measures like the sugar tax and banning junk food ads before 9pm are sufficient to combat obesity, especially in children. Or if more drastic steps are needed. For instance, expanding taxes to sweets and snacks, compulsory food education, etc.. Alternatively, argue that government shouldn’t interfere too much and personal responsibility is key. Use NHS data on obesity and results (or criticisms) of current policies.
- Should vaccination be mandatory for schoolchildren? – Persuade your audience on whether children must be up to date on vaccines (like MMR) to attend school, aside from medical exemptions. This intersects health and ethics: pro arguments cite herd immunity and protecting vulnerable kids (mention recent measles outbreaks in parts of the UK). By contrast, cons might mention individual choice or religious objections. Given recent events, you can also reference COVID-19 vaccine debates to illustrate points on public safety.
- Ban smoking for the next generation? – New Zealand announced plans to ban sale of tobacco to anyone born after a certain year. Argue if the UK should implement a similar policy, effectively phasing out smoking with a generation-wide ban. Discuss public health benefits (reduced NHS burden, longer lives) vs. criticisms (libertarian arguments or potential black market issues). It’s a forward-looking topic about how proactive government should be in shaping health behaviour.
- The benefits of a plant-based diet – Persuade listeners that adopting a vegetarian or vegan diet has significant benefits for health, the environment, and animal welfare. Use UK context like the rising popularity of “Meat-Free Monday” or the availability of plant-based options in shops. Provide evidence on reduced heart disease risk and carbon footprint. On the flip side, acknowledge challenges or argue why balanced omnivorous diets are also healthy. You can tailor this to how strongly you want to push the persuasive angle. You can either encouraging more plant-based eating or outright convincing everyone to go vegan.
- Make PE (Physical Education) optional at GCSE level – Debate whether students aged 14-16 should be able to drop compulsory PE if they have no interest or aptitude, to focus on other subjects. Argue for student choice and that forced sport can put some off fitness entirely; or argue that PE is crucial for health, teamwork, and a break from academics, so it must remain mandatory. Use examples of how some students feel about school sports, or how physical activity is linked to academic performance.
- Should advertising of junk food be banned? – A health-related media topic: persuade your audience on whether advertisements for unhealthy foods (high in sugar, salt, fat) should be banned on TV, online, and in public spaces, especially targeting children. The UK has considered stronger regulations in this area. Pro arguments revolve around protecting children and reducing obesity. Con arguments might cite advertising industry impact, personal choice, or question how effective a ban would be.
- Universal basic income for better mental health – This topic crosses economics and health: argue that introducing a Universal Basic Income (a fixed monthly payment to all citizens) in the UK could reduce stress, depression, and other mental health issues linked to financial insecurity and poverty. Explain how constant financial stress affects well-being and how a UBI might alleviate it, using pilot studies or trials (like the one in Finland) for evidence. Opponents might argue about cost or that there are better targeted ways to help people. This is a creative angle showing how economic policy can be framed in terms of public health benefits.
Environment and climate change speech topics
- Should the UK ban all petrol and diesel cars by 2030? – The UK government has plans to ban new petrol/diesel car sales by 2030. Argue whether this timeline is realistic and beneficial for the environment. A persuasive speech could highlight climate change commitments, pollution reduction in cities, and the rise of electric vehicles vs. concerns about infrastructure (charging stations) and the impact on car owners and industries. You could take a stance to accelerate the ban even sooner, or delay it, depending on your argument.
- Invest in renewable energy over fossil fuels – Persuade your listeners that the UK must prioritise renewable energy sources like wind, solar, and tidal power instead of continuing to rely on oil, coal, or gas. Use examples such as the UK’s success in offshore wind farms, or the need to meet carbon-neutral targets by 2050. Argue the benefits (reducing greenhouse gases, creating green jobs, energy independence) while addressing counterpoints (intermittency of renewables, cost). This is a globally relevant topic with a local angle (e.g., mention North Sea oil vs. wind farms).
- Should fracking be allowed in the UK? – A controversial environmental issue: argue for or against hydraulic fracturing (fracking) for natural gas in the UK. Proponents say it could boost energy supply and economic growth (mention areas like Lancashire where fracking was attempted). Alternatively opponents cite environmental risks like earthquakes, water contamination, and continued fossil fuel dependency. As a speaker, you might persuade the audience that renewable alternatives make fracking unnecessary and risky.
- Climate protest tactics: justified or too extreme? – Debate the methods used by climate activists (like Extinction Rebellion or Just Stop Oil) who have blocked roads or disrupted events to draw attention to climate change. Persuade your audience whether these civil disobedience tactics are a necessary wake-up call to the public and government or whether they are counterproductive, alienating people and violating laws. Use real examples of protests in the UK and their outcomes to argue your case.
- Should the UK introduce a meat tax to fight climate change? – Argue whether there should be a tax on meat (especially beef and lamb) due to their high carbon footprint, to encourage more sustainable diets. This topic intersects environment, economy, and personal choice: you can discuss the significant emissions from livestock farming and how a tax could reduce consumption, versus how it might affect farmers, food prices, and individual freedoms. It’s a provocative idea that would make audiences think about everyday habits in relation to climate.
- Protection of rural land vs. housing needs – Persuade listeners on how Britain should balance preserving green belts and countryside with the pressing need for new housing. One side is to argue against building on greenbelt land to protect ecosystems and heritage (citing examples of local campaigns to stop housing developments). The other side is to argue that the housing crisis (especially for young people) necessitates using some protected lands or increasing urban density, with careful planning. This topic brings in environmentalism, social issues, and planning policy.
- Plastic pollution: should single-use plastics be completely banned? – Discuss whether the UK should outlaw single-use plastics (like throwaway cutlery, cups, and excessive packaging) to protect oceans and wildlife. A persuasive speech can highlight how plastic waste is harming marine life (perhaps reference campaigns to clean the River Thames or beaches) and how alternatives (biodegradable materials, reusables) could replace them. Address practical challenges and the role of consumer behaviour as counterpoints.
- Rewilding Britain’s countryside – Argue in favour of reintroducing native species and allowing large areas of land to return to a wild state (for example, bringing back beavers or even lynx to certain areas, or creating wildflower meadows on unused farmland). Persuade your audience that rewilding helps biodiversity, climate mitigation, and creates a richer natural heritage for the UK. Some might oppose due to fears of affecting farming or local livelihoods, which you can discuss and refute by highlighting successful projects (like the Knepp Estate’s rewilding in England).
- Should climate change denial be treated like hate speech? – A provocative topic: argue whether spreading misinformation about climate change (denying scientific consensus) should be regulated or censored because of the potential harm it causes to collective action against an existential threat. You would weigh free speech rights against the idea that severe misinformation could be dangerous (like how health misinformation is handled). This is a complex ethical question and could invite strong opinions.
- Urban congestion charges for cleaner air – Persuade listeners that more UK cities should implement or expand congestion charges (fees for driving in city centres, like London’s Congestion Charge and ULEZ) to reduce traffic and air pollution. Use evidence of improved air quality and reduced congestion where such schemes exist, and argue it encourages public transport use and cleaner vehicles. Counterarguments might be about the cost to motorists and businesses, which you can address by pointing to long-term benefits and possible exemptions.
Technology and innovation speech topics
- AI taking our jobs: threat or opportunity? – Discuss the impact of artificial intelligence on the job market, specifically in the UK context. Persuade your audience whether AI will create more jobs than it destroys or if widespread automation (in industries like manufacturing, retail, even law) will lead to unemployment that we must proactively manage. Use examples like self-checkout machines, autonomous vehicles, or AI in customer service, and suggest solutions such as retraining programmes or AI regulation depending on your stance.
- Regulate Big Tech to protect privacy – Argue that the UK government should enforce stricter regulations on technology giants (like Google, Facebook, Amazon) to protect users’ data privacy and prevent monopolistic behaviour. You can mention the misuse of data (Cambridge Analytica scandal), surveillance capitalism, or the EU’s GDPR as a framework. Persuade listeners that without tougher laws, individuals and society are at risk. Alternatively, you could argue that innovation would be stifled, but typically a student speech would focus on consumer protection.
- Should social media require real name identification? – Debate whether users should have to verify their identity (real name, ID) to create accounts on platforms like Twitter or Instagram, in order to reduce anonymous trolling, hate speech, and online abuse. Argue if this would create a safer online environment (people might be more polite if their name is attached, and illegal abuse could be traced) versus the concerns about privacy, free expression (for whistleblowers or activists), and the practicality of enforcing it.
- The ethics of human cloning and genetic engineering – A futuristic and ethical topic: persuade your audience on whether cloning humans or editing human embryos (for disease prevention or trait selection) should be allowed. You can discuss the scientific progress in gene editing (like CRISPR babies controversy) and the UK’s laws (the UK permits research on embryos up to 14 days, and “3-parent baby” IVF for mitochondrial diseases, but not designer babies). Argue either that tightly regulated scientific advancement could eliminate genetic diseases, or that crossing this line is unethical and risky. This topic is heavy on ethics and science, so use clear explanations.
- Should schools ban the use of ChatGPT and AI tools in assignments? – A very current issue in education and tech: argue for or against allowing AI writing assistants in academic work. A persuasive angle might be that using AI can be considered cheating or hampers learning critical skills, urging schools to implement strict policies. On the other hand, one could argue these tools are like calculators for writing and students should be taught how to use them ethically. This is highly relevant to students and can draw on experiences of plagiarism concerns and the evolving nature of assessment.
- Space exploration: worth the money? – Persuade your audience on whether the UK (and humanity in general) should spend significant resources on space exploration and projects like missions to Mars or a moon base. Pro-space arguments include scientific discovery, inspiring innovation (the UK has a growing space tech sector), and even protecting humanity’s future. Anti-space arguments might say money should be spent on problems here on Earth like poverty and climate. Mention the UK Space Agency’s initiatives or international efforts for context.
- Should there be limits on smartphone use by age? – Debate if legal or formal limits should restrict how young children can use smartphones/tablets. For instance, persuasive points could include banning smartphones for under-12s, or requiring parental control by law, due to screen time effect on development, exposure to harmful content, etc. On the flip side, argue that it’s the role of parents, not the state, to moderate children’s device use, and that technology also has educational benefits.
- Crypto and Bitcoin: fad or future? – Persuade listeners on whether cryptocurrencies are a positive innovation that the UK should embrace (e.g., discuss potential for financial innovation, freedom from banks, successful UK crypto startups) or mostly a dangerous speculative fad that needs tight regulation to protect consumers (mention crypto scams, volatility, environmental concerns of Bitcoin’s energy use). This topic blends finance, technology, and regulation in a way that can be very engaging for some audiences.
- Is technology making us less social? – A broader topic where you argue whether modern tech (social media, smartphones, online gaming) is actually reducing face-to-face interaction and social skills among young people in the UK. You can share observations or studies about people socialising less in person or being glued to phones, and persuade that we should “unplug” more often. Alternatively, note how tech also connects people across distances and can help introverted individuals socialise in comfortable ways. It’s a relatable theme for many.
- Drones in public spaces: useful or nuisance? – Argue the case for tighter control of drone use by hobbyists in the UK. There have been incidents like the Gatwick Airport disruption by drones. Discuss whether drones should be banned in certain areas or require strict licensing due to privacy and safety, versus their benefits for photography, recreation, and business (and the idea that reasonable rules already exist). It’s a narrower tech topic but can branch into privacy and public safety.
Economy and work speech topics
- Four-day work week in the UK – Persuade your audience whether Britain should adopt a four-day work week (with the same pay) as a standard. Use examples from recent UK company trials that have reportedly improved work-life balance and productivity. Argue benefits like reduced stress, more time for family or education, and potential productivity gains versus challenges like maintaining service coverage and possibly higher costs for employers. This topic is very current and touches on workers’ rights, business outcomes, and quality of life.
- Raise the minimum wage to a real living wage – Debate whether the UK government should significantly raise the minimum wage (the National Living Wage for over 23s, and minimum for younger workers) to match the actual cost of living. Argue how higher wages could reduce poverty and reliance on benefits (with examples of London vs rest-of-UK living costs), or conversely discuss potential impacts on small businesses and employment if wages rise too quickly. This is a practical topic with moral and economic angles.
- The wealth tax debate – Argue for or against implementing a wealth tax on the ultra-rich in the UK. A persuasive speech might claim that billionaires and multimillionaires should contribute more to society through a tax on their net worth above a high threshold, to fund public services or reduce inequality. Use examples of how the richest have grown richer, and maybe cite other countries’ approaches. Opponents would say it could drive investment away or be difficult to enforce. It’s a topic at the intersection of fairness and economic policy.
- Gig economy workers: employees or freelancers? – Discuss whether companies like Uber, Deliveroo, and others in the gig economy should be required to treat their drivers/riders as employees with benefits (holiday pay, pensions) rather than self-employed contractors. Argue how current gig workers often lack security and how reclassification (as seen in some UK court rulings for Uber drivers) would improve lives. Or on the flip side, discuss how this might reduce flexibility and increase costs, potentially reducing opportunities. This is very relevant with ongoing legal and political debates in the UK about worker rights.
- Does Brexit help or hurt the UK economy? – Now a few years on, take a persuasive stance on whether Brexit has been economically beneficial or detrimental. Support your argument with examples: changes in trade (shortages in some goods, new trade deals, changes for fishermen or farmers), impact on jobs and investment (like companies relocating or new freedoms). This can be a charged topic, so focus on economic evidence and real-life implications for people (jobs, prices, opportunities) to persuade either that Brexit is opening new doors or that it has closed off important ones.
- Solve the housing crisis by building on green belt land – Argue that to address the UK’s housing shortage and sky-high property prices, the government should allow more development on certain protected lands (green belts around cities). Persuade listeners by highlighting the difficulties young people face getting on the property ladder and how increasing housing supply is crucial. Discuss how careful planning could minimise environmental impact. Alternatively, argue that we should not touch green belts and instead focus on urban redevelopment and affordable housing schemes. Either way, the speech centres on the economy, environment, and social need.
- Should we ban unpaid internships? – Persuade your audience on whether unpaid internships (outside of formal education requirements) should be made illegal in the UK. Argue that unpaid internships favour those who can afford to work for free (often disadvantaging lower-income students) and exploit young workers. As such, propose that all work commands at least the minimum wage. Provide examples from industries like media or fashion where unpaid roles are common. Opposing arguments might be that internships provide experience when companies can’t budget for interns. But the trend is toward fair pay.
- High CEO pay: is it justified? – Debate the huge salaries and bonuses of CEOs at large companies, some earning hundreds of times more than the average employee. Persuade your audience if government or shareholders should act to cap or reduce executive pay, on grounds of fairness and company morale, or argue that high pay is justified by the responsibility and results expected from those roles (perhaps citing the global market for top executive talent). Use UK examples, like the CEO pay at FTSE 100 companies vs. workers, to illustrate the scale.
- Tourism vs. local economy in city centres – Some UK cities (like Bath, Edinburgh, or even certain London boroughs) face a tension between catering to tourists and serving local residents. Argue whether city centres should prioritise local businesses and affordable housing for residents over tourist attractions, souvenir shops and short-term holiday rentals (e.g. via Airbnb). You could persuade that without measures, locals are priced out and city character is lost; or counter-argue that tourism is a vital economic driver and brings cultural exchange. This topic connects economics with community well-being.
- Should we nationalise essential utilities? – Persuade your listeners on whether services like railways, water supply, or energy should be brought back into public ownership in the UK. This topic has gained traction with debates about rail fare increases and water companies’ performance (e.g. sewage spills). Argue the case that government-run services could prioritise public good over profit (using historical or international comparisons). Or that privatisationl fails in certain areas and needs reversing. Conversely, note that nationalisation could be costly and not necessarily efficient, if taking an opposing view. It’s a classic policy debate with real examples like Railtrack/Network Rail or British Rail vs. private train operators.
Sports and leisure speech topics
- Equal pay in sports: a fair goal? – Argue whether female athletes, such as the Lionesses in women’s football, should receive equal pay as their male counterparts in equivalent competitions. A persuasive speech could highlight the success of England’s women’s football team, growing audiences, and the principle of equality, against counterpoints about revenue differences and market rates. The topic can broaden into how to promote women’s sports and whether pay equity would accelerate that.
- Esports in the Olympics – yes or no? – Debate if we should include competitive video gaming (esports) as Olympic sports or in school sports programmes. Argue for recognition of esports by noting the skill, training, and huge followings involved (plus universities offering esports courses and scholarships), or argue against by emphasising physical aspect of traditional sports and potential health concerns of gaming. This topic merges sports, technology, and culture.
- Should we allow performance-enhancing drugs in sports? – A controversial take: argue whether we should relax, keep as is, or even strengthen doping regulations. One could provocatively suggest a separate “enhanced” league or that allowing some substances under medical supervision could level playing fields and reduce clandestine cheating. Or strongly argue that PEDs undermine fair play and athlete health, upholding the importance of strict drug testing (with examples from cycling, athletics). This is sure to engage an audience interested in sports ethics.
- Scrap hosting mega sports events? – Persuade your audience whether countries (like the UK) should avoid hosting massive events like the Olympics or World Cup due to cost and disruption. Use examples such as London 2012’s cost vs. its legacy, and Qatar 2022 controversies, to discuss if the prestige and potential tourism benefits outweigh the public expense and inconveniences. Alternatively, argue that hosting unites a country, improves infrastructure, and inspires youth in sports, citing how 2012 boosted sports participation (if it did) or national pride.
- Video Assistant Referee (VAR) technology: improving football or ruining it? – A topic for football fans: argue if VAR in the Premier League is making the game fairer and more accurate in decisions or if it’s killing the joy and flow of the sport with interruptions and contentious calls. Persuade by referencing notorious VAR moments that changed games and how fans/players react. It’s a spirited subject that combines sport and technology, and even non-football fans understand the idea of tradition vs. tech in sport.
- Should we ban extreme sports for under-18s? – Sports like skydiving, rock climbing, or boxing carry risks. Argue whether laws should prevent young people (minors) from engaging in certain high-risk sports, or whether it’s an individual’s (and their parents’) choice. Use examples of injuries and long-term health concerns (like concussion risks in boxing or rugby) to argue for bans or stricter rules, versus the values of discipline, thrill, and personal freedom these activities provide.
- Are sports scholarships fair in university admissions? – Debate the practice (more common in the US, but present in UK to some extent) of giving university placements or scholarships to talented athletes who may not meet the usual academic requirements. Argue if this diversifies and enriches campus life and rewards hard-working sports players, or if it undermines academic standards and disadvantages other students. For a UK twist, refer to how some universities recruit for rowing or other sports. Alternatively, explore how schools allocate funding to elite student athletes.
- Club vs. country: What matters more? – In sports like football or cricket, sometimes players have conflicts between playing for their club or their national team (e.g., club managers worrying about player injuries on England duty). Argue whether representing one’s country should always take priority over club commitments, emphasising national pride and the unifying power of international sport, or if the professional era means the clubs (who pay the players’ wages) deserve priority. This is more niche, but sports enthusiasts would relate.
- Should sports teams be punished for fans’ behaviour? – Persuade your audience on whether teams should face penalties (fines, playing matches behind closed doors, point deductions) due to violent or abusive behaviour by some of their supporters. Use examples from football (racist chants leading to sanctions, or teams penalised for crowd trouble) to weigh collective responsibility versus individual accountability. It’s a topic about fairness and deterrence in sports contexts.
- Mandatory sports participation vs. personal choice – Argue whether teenagers should be required to participate in at least one sport or physical activity, either through school or community programmes. Pro arguments: promotes health, teamwork, and can combat youth obesity and screen addiction. Con side: forced participation might breed resentment, and not everyone is sporty – other activities (art, music, etc.) might be their passion. This topic ties together leisure, health, and education policy.
Media and entertainment speech topics
- Regulating content on streaming platforms – Persuade your audience on whether services like Netflix, Amazon Prime, or BBC iPlayer should be subject to the same content regulations as traditional broadcast TV. For example, should there be stricter age ratings, limits on explicit content, or requirements to show a certain amount of British-produced content? Argue either that regulation is needed to protect viewers (and promote local culture). Or that streaming thrives because of creative freedom and viewer choice.
- The ethics of reality TV – Many reality TV shows (from Love Island to The Apprentice) are popular in the UK but often attract criticism. Argue whether reality TV exploits participants and promotes negative values (like excessive drama, invasion of privacy, or body image issues) and thus demand tighter control or boycotting. Or defend reality TV as harmless entertainment and even an opportunity for contestants to gain experience or fame. Use examples of well-known shows and incidents (like mental health concerns for contestants after shows) to support your case.
- Are video games art? – A cultural debate: persuade listeners on whether video games should be considered a legitimate form of art and storytelling, just like films or literature. You can reference games with rich narratives or beautiful design, and note museums exhibiting games, to argue they are art. Skeptics might say games are just entertainment or lack the depth of traditional art – you can refute that by highlighting player emotional engagement and creativity in game design.
- Should we remove certain books from school libraries? – This addresses censorship and education. Argue for or against removing or restricting “inappropriate” books (due to mature themes, obsolete language, etc.) from school libraries or reading lists. Persuade your audience about intellectual freedom and learning from uncomfortable history versus protecting students from harmful content. For a UK angle, mention debates around texts like Of Mice and Men or others that have faced challenges.
- Celebrity culture: harmless fun or harmful obsession? – Discuss whether Britain’s fascination with celebrities (from royal family members to reality TV stars) is a problem. Argue that celebrity culture sets unrealistic lifestyles and distracts people from important issues, possibly referencing the tabloid press’s focus on gossip. Or argue that following celebrities is a natural diversion and can even be positive when celebs use their platform for good causes. This topic can connect to social media influences and mental health as well.
- Should we abolish the BBC licence fee? – A very UK-specific media topic. Argue if the TV licence fee (which funds the BBC) requires scrapping or reorganising into a different funding model. Persuade listeners by weighing the value of the BBC’s public service broadcasting (no adverts, quality content like BBC News, education, arts) against criticisms that the fee is archaic in a multi-channel, streaming era and places a burden on households. You could propose alternatives like subscription or government funding and discuss how that might affect the BBC’s independence.
- Is censorship of music lyrics ever justified? – Debate whether songs with explicit or offensive lyrics require censoring (i.e. bleeped out on radio/TV, age-restricted, etc.). Argue free expression and artistic freedom versus the impact on listeners (especially children) and social responsibility of broadcasters. You might cite cases like drill music being blamed for violence or old songs with offensive terms being edited for radio today. This crosses media, art, and social responsibility.
- Do violent films and TV contribute to real-world violence? – Persuade your audience on the long-running debate about media violence. Use research or expert opinions to argue that violent media desensitises people and can encourage aggression (and thus require limitation or come with strong warnings). Or counter that there’s no proven causation and such content is just reflecting or exploring human issues. For a UK touch, you could reference the Video Recordings Act and the regulation of “video nasties” in the 1980s.
- The role of the media in a democracy – Argue whether the British media (press and TV news) is fulfilling its role as the “fourth estate” – holding power to account – or if it’s failing due to bias, clickbait, or concentration of ownership. Persuade listeners if we need reforms like stronger independent press standards, diverse ownership rules, or if the media is doing well in exposing issues like political scandals (expenses, etc.) and informing the public. This can be quite expansive, so focusing on a specific point (like media bias or trust) might help.
- Should libraries and museums be free to enter? – Many UK national museums are free, but local ones sometimes charge. Libraries are free but under threat from budget cuts. Argue that we must preserve free access to libraries and museums as they are vital for education, equality of access to culture, and community well-being (with examples of library importance or museum educational programmes). Alternatively, if taking a contrary stance, argue that small fees or donations are necessary for maintenance and that. Moreover, new funding models are necessary as government support wanes. This topic ties into culture, education, and public funding.
Choosing the right speech topic is a crucial first step in writing a persuasive speech. But remember that any speech topic can be effective if you approach it with genuine interest, thorough preparation, and a clear structure. Good luck, and remember: the power of persuasion lies as much in how you say it as in what you say. With practice and passion, you can influence hearts and minds on any of these persuasive speech topics.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: